Opposition to critical race theory can be considered a philosophical belief and is a protected characteristic under UK equality laws, an employment judge has ruled in a discrimination claim brought against Acas, the government’s workplace conciliation service.
In a judgment dated 11 September 2023, Employment Judge Kirsty Ayre said that Sean Corby’s views on critical race theory—an academic framework that considers how racial bias is inherent in society—fall within the Equality Act 2010 and are a protected philosophical belief.
Judge Ayre, who presided over a three-day hearing at the Leeds Employment Tribunal, said Corby had clearly thought carefully and seriously about his beliefs and that they formed an important part of his identity, affecting the way Corby lives his life.
The three-person tribunal panel unanimously agreed that what Corby described as his philosophical beliefs are genuinely held and backed up by his own lived experience—of being married to a black woman and being the father of black children.
The tribunal agreed that Corby’s beliefs were grounded in a philosophical system, and that the comments he posted on a communication platform—which form the basis of his claim—all stemmed from that system.
Formed in 2017, following significant legislative changes designed to increase competition within the legal services marketplace, Pro Employment Law is a progressive set of barristers’ chambers, consisting only of experienced employment law barristers, offering a full range of specialist advisory, case management, and advocacy services directly to the public through the Public Access scheme. We supply our legal services exclusively in the area of Employment Law to clients located across England & Wales. All of the legal services we supply are covered by professional indemnity insurance with Bar Mutual.
Please contact us for a free, initial telephone consultation with a barrister.
In McMahon v AXA ICAS [2025] EAT 8, the EAT faced a number of issues on appeal around the payment due from a deduction of wages as well as a disability discrimination claim which was struck out by the employment tribunal. The respondent also cross-appealed a decision on deduction of wages, arguing that there was… >>
Where a claimant has failed to comply with the early conciliation (EC) requirement but the employment tribunal did not reject the claim under either Rule 10 or 12 of the ET Rules 2013 (now Rules 12 or 13 of the ET Rules 2024), the tribunal should not reject the claim at a later stage, eg… >>
In East Lancashire NHS Trust v Akram [2025] EAT 2, the EAT followed the approach set out by the Supreme Court in Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland v Agnew [2024] IRLR 56 on how to calculate a day’s pay for holiday pay purposes. It explained that: • a person should receive… >>