ET should have considered the issue of redeployment as a matter of course

In Bugden v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2024] EAT 80 the claimant, who had been dismissed as a result of periods of ill-health absence over a number of years, contended that the employment tribunal should itself have raised the possibility of redeployment both as a potential reasonable adjustment under EqA 2010, s 20 and in relation to its determination of the fairness of the dismissal under ERA 1996, s 98(4). This issue had not been argued by the claimant before the employment tribunal and was not referred to in the list of issues.

The EAT held that the tribunal:

  • had not erred in failing to raise redeployment as a potential reasonable adjustment with the parties as it was not an issue which ‘shouted out’ from the material before it, but
  • had erred in failing to consider the issue of redeployment, as an alternative to dismissal, when determining the fairness of the dismissal as this was a sufficiently well-established principle that it should have addressed as a matter of course even though it had not been raised by the parties.

Contact Us

Please contact us for a free, initial telephone consultation with a barrister.

020 7459 4619

    Contact Us





    Latest News

    EAT overturns strike-out order

    In McMahon v AXA ICAS [2025] EAT 8, the EAT faced a number of issues on appeal around the payment due from a deduction of wages as well as a disability discrimination claim which was struck out by the employment tribunal. The respondent also cross-appealed a decision on deduction of wages, arguing that there was… >>

    31 January 2025

    EAT looks at how to calculate the rate of pay for a day’s holiday

    In East Lancashire NHS Trust v Akram [2025] EAT 2, the EAT followed the approach set out by the Supreme Court in Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland v Agnew [2024] IRLR 56 on how to calculate a day’s pay for holiday pay purposes. It explained that: • a person should receive… >>

    17 January 2025