Revised Presidential Guidance on employment tribunals taking oral evidence from persons located abroad

The Presidents of the Employment Tribunals in England and Wales, Barry Clarke, and in Scotland, Susan Walker, have issued revised guidance for employment tribunals on how they should take oral evidence by video or telephone from persons located abroad.

 What are the practical implications of this development?

The revisions to the Presidential Guidance provide some updated information and additional clarification which may be helpful for parties wishing to rely on oral evidence from witnesses located abroad.

In summary, the revisions include:

  • clarification that permission from the foreign state is not required when evidence is to be given from Crown Dependencies or British Overseas Territories
  • an update that the Taking of Evidence (ToE) Unit has collected information received from different overseas governments and, in due course, the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) will publish a list of the responses
  • clarification of how such a list, published or otherwise, may be used by HMCTS instead of contacting the ToE Unit, and
  • an indication that tribunals may wish to consider the impact of any conditions imposed by the foreign state and whether the giving of evidence in those circumstances would be contrary to the interests of justice.

Parties seeking to rely on oral evidence from abroad should make their request to the employment tribunal at the earliest opportunity. This is because there may be delays in getting a response, especially if the foreign state has not previously given its stated position on the taking of oral evidence from its territory.

Contact Us

Please contact us for a free, initial telephone consultation with a barrister.

020 7459 4619

    Contact Us





    Latest News

    EAT overturns strike-out order

    In McMahon v AXA ICAS [2025] EAT 8, the EAT faced a number of issues on appeal around the payment due from a deduction of wages as well as a disability discrimination claim which was struck out by the employment tribunal. The respondent also cross-appealed a decision on deduction of wages, arguing that there was… >>

    31 January 2025

    EAT looks at how to calculate the rate of pay for a day’s holiday

    In East Lancashire NHS Trust v Akram [2025] EAT 2, the EAT followed the approach set out by the Supreme Court in Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland v Agnew [2024] IRLR 56 on how to calculate a day’s pay for holiday pay purposes. It explained that: • a person should receive… >>

    17 January 2025