In Owen v Willow Tower Case No 200073/2022, an employment tribunal (ET) has recently considered whether an alleged belief in ethical veganism was sufficient to amount to a protected belief under the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010), and therefore attract protection from discrimination. The claimant worked as bank staff in a care home and raised a grievance following a decision that all staff should be vaccinated against coronavirus (COVID-19).
In Owen, the claimant followed a vegan diet and believed she was therefore exempt from having the vaccine (as it may contain animal products or be tested on animals). She also had concerns about the possible side-effects of the vaccine and its efficacy. She raised a grievance which was not upheld and she was dismissed for not complying with the legal requirement for care home staff to be vaccinated (unless exempt); she subsequently brought claims for unfair dismissal and religion or belief discrimination. On the latter, the ET found that the claimant’s alleged belief in ethical veganism was not a protected belief under EqA 2010 in these particular circumstances.
Formed in 2017, following significant legislative changes designed to increase competition within the legal services marketplace, Pro Employment Law is a progressive set of barristers’ chambers, consisting only of experienced employment law barristers, offering a full range of specialist advisory, case management, and advocacy services directly to the public through the Public Access scheme. We supply our legal services exclusively in the area of Employment Law to clients located across England & Wales. All of the legal services we supply are covered by professional indemnity insurance with Bar Mutual.
Please contact us for a free, initial telephone consultation with a barrister.
In McMahon v AXA ICAS [2025] EAT 8, the EAT faced a number of issues on appeal around the payment due from a deduction of wages as well as a disability discrimination claim which was struck out by the employment tribunal. The respondent also cross-appealed a decision on deduction of wages, arguing that there was… >>
Where a claimant has failed to comply with the early conciliation (EC) requirement but the employment tribunal did not reject the claim under either Rule 10 or 12 of the ET Rules 2013 (now Rules 12 or 13 of the ET Rules 2024), the tribunal should not reject the claim at a later stage, eg… >>
In East Lancashire NHS Trust v Akram [2025] EAT 2, the EAT followed the approach set out by the Supreme Court in Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland v Agnew [2024] IRLR 56 on how to calculate a day’s pay for holiday pay purposes. It explained that: • a person should receive… >>